Weinstock v. Walker
This text of 331 F. App'x 101 (Weinstock v. Walker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
SUMMARY ORDER
Plaintiff-appellant Audrey Weinstock appeals from an order of the district court (Amon, Judge) dated May 30, 2006, adopting the bankruptcy court’s (Craig, Bankruptcy Judge) proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law, and dismissing this action. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts, procedural history, and specification of issues on appeal.
After having reviewed Weinstock’s contentions on appeal and the record of proceedings below, we affirm for substantially the same reasons stated by the district court in its memorandum and order of May 30, 2006. We have considered all of Weinstock’s arguments and find them to be without merit.
Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
331 F. App'x 101, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weinstock-v-walker-ca2-2009.