Weinstock v. Hallenbeck
163 A.D. 966
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 15, 1914·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and diSv bursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. (See Wiechers v. New Home Sewing Machine Co., 38 App. Div. 1; Heishon v. Knickerbocker [967]*967Life Ins. Co., 77 N. Y. 278; People ex rel. Cecere v. Slocum, 161 App. Div. 733.) Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Weinstock v. Hallenbeck, 163 A.D. 966 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).
163 A.D. 966 (Weinstock v. Hallenbeck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Metera v. Foster Paving Block Co.
155 N.Y.S. 760 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1915)