Weinstock v. City of Plantation

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Weinstock v. City of Plantation

664 So. 2d 66, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12715, 1995 WL 733316

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 13, 1995

DocketNo. 94-2434

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 664 So. 2d 66 (Weinstock v. City of Plantation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Weinstock v. City of Plantation, 664 So. 2d 66, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12715, 1995 WL 733316 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse and remand for a new trial on future economic damages only. See Auto-Owners Ins. Co. v. Tompkins, 651 So.2d 89 (Fla.1995). Albeit harmless, the errors asserted in appellant’s third and fourth issues on appeal are not to be repeated. We find no reversible error on these two issues nor any of the remaining issues not discussed hereinabove and affirm as to same.

GLICKSTEIN, WARNER and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We reverse and remand for a new trial on future economic damages only. See Auto-Owners Ins. Co. v. Tompkins, 651 So.2d 89 (Fla.1995). Albeit harmless, the errors asserted in appellant’s third and fourth issues on appeal are not to be repeated. We find no reversible error on these two issues nor any of the remaining issues not discussed hereinabove and affirm as to same.

GLICKSTEIN, WARNER and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

664 So. 2d 66, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12715, 1995 WL 733316, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weinstock-v-city-of-plantation-fladistctapp-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack