Weinstock v. City of Plantation
664 So. 2d 66, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12715, 1995 WL 733316
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 13, 1995·No. No. 94-2434·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We reverse and remand for a new trial on future economic damages only. See Auto-Owners Ins. Co. v. Tompkins, 651 So.2d 89 (Fla.1995). Albeit harmless, the errors asserted in appellant’s third and fourth issues on appeal are not to be repeated. We find no reversible error on these two issues nor any of the remaining issues not discussed hereinabove and affirm as to same.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Weinstock v. City of Plantation, 664 So. 2d 66, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12715, 1995 WL 733316 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).
664 So. 2d 66 (Weinstock v. City of Plantation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
De Soto v. Guardianship of De Soto
664 So. 2d 66 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)