Weinstein v. Weisser

240 A.D. 724
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 15, 1933·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment modified by providing that the defendant be enjoined from the continued maintenance of the said fence to a height in excess of ten feet, measured from the established grade at the curb (122 East 40th Street Corp. v. Dranyam Realty Corp., 226 App. Div. 78), and as so modified, unanimously affirmed, without costs. We are of opinion that the fence was erected in bad faith and, as constructed, constitutes a private nuisance, but we think that under section 3 of the Real Property Law an owner may erect a fence on his land to the height of ten feet, measured in conformity with the holding in the case cited. Findings and conclusions inconsistent herewith are reversed and new findings accordingly will be made, order to be settled on notice. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Weinstein v. Weisser, 240 A.D. 724 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

240 A.D. 724 (Weinstein v. Weisser) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Flores v. Franceschini
1 A.D.2d 899 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1956)