Weinstein v. Weinstein

Ohio Supreme Court

Weinstein v. Weinstein

172 Ohio St. (N.S.) 474

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided November 8, 1961·No. No. 37206·Published

Opinion

The appeal as of right herein is dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

Appeal dismissed.

Zimmerman, acting C. J., Radcliee, Taet, Matthias, Bell, Herbert and O’Neill, JJ., concur. Zimmerman, J., sitting in the place and stead of Weygandt, C. J. Radcliee, J., of the Fourth Appellate District,' sitting by designation in the place and stead of Zimmerman, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The appeal as of right herein is dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

Appeal dismissed.

Zimmerman, acting C. J., Radcliee, Taet, Matthias, Bell, Herbert and O’Neill, JJ., concur. Zimmerman, J., sitting in the place and stead of Weygandt, C. J. Radcliee, J., of the Fourth Appellate District,' sitting by designation in the place and stead of Zimmerman, J.

Weinstein v. Weinstein, 172 Ohio St. (N.S.) 474 (Ohio 1961).

Pincite

172 Ohio St. (N.S.) 474 (Weinstein v. Weinstein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.