Weinstein v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Weinstein v. State

97 A.D.2d 541, 468 N.Y.S.2d 580, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20150

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 31, 1983

DocketClaim No. 64786

StatusPublished

This text of 97 A.D.2d 541 (Weinstein v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Weinstein v. State, 97 A.D.2d 541, 468 N.Y.S.2d 580, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20150 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

In a condemnation proceeding, the State of New York appeals from a judgment of the Court of Claims (Silverman, J.), dated November 19, 1982, which, after a nonjury trial, awarded claimants a total sum of $54,553.02 for the appropriation of real property owned by them. Judgment reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs or disbursements, and matter remitted to the Court of Claims for further proceedings consistent herewith. On May 20, 1980, the State acquired title to a narrow strip of vacant and unimproved property owned by claimants. Due to the taking, egress and ingress to claimants’ property from Sunrise Highway was eliminated. The remaining parcel was accessible solely via North Queens Avenue. The State alleges that the court erred in assuming that said adjoining street was, at the time of taking, a one-way thoroughfare, thus curtailing access to claimants’ property, when in actuality it was a two-way street providing full access. The evidence in the record is not sufficient to enable us to review the award inasmuch as there is confusion as to whether or not North Queens Avenue was a two-way street at the time of the taking. Accordingly, there must be a new trial at which that limited issue can be resolved and an appropriate award rendered based on the court’s determination. Mangano, J. P., Gibbons, O’Con-nor and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a condemnation proceeding, the State of New York appeals from a judgment of the Court of Claims (Silverman, J.), dated November 19, 1982, which, after a nonjury trial, awarded claimants a total sum of $54,553.02 for the appropriation of real property owned by them. Judgment reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs or disbursements, and matter remitted to the Court of Claims for further proceedings consistent herewith. On May 20, 1980, the State acquired title to a narrow strip of vacant and unimproved property owned by claimants. Due to the taking, egress and ingress to claimants’ property from Sunrise Highway was eliminated. The remaining parcel was accessible solely via North Queens Avenue. The State alleges that the court erred in assuming that said adjoining street was, at the time of taking, a one-way thoroughfare, thus curtailing access to claimants’ property, when in actuality it was a two-way street providing full access. The evidence in the record is not sufficient to enable us to review the award inasmuch as there is confusion as to whether or not North Queens Avenue was a two-way street at the time of the taking. Accordingly, there must be a new trial at which that limited issue can be resolved and an appropriate award rendered based on the court’s determination. Mangano, J. P., Gibbons, O’Con-nor and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

97 A.D.2d 541, 468 N.Y.S.2d 580, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20150, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weinstein-v-state-nyappdiv-1983.