Weinstein v. Sanford

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Weinstein v. Sanford

20 A.D.2d 623, 245 N.Y.S.2d 971, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2741

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 12, 1963

StatusPublished

This text of 20 A.D.2d 623 (Weinstein v. Sanford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Weinstein v. Sanford, 20 A.D.2d 623, 245 N.Y.S.2d 971, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2741 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

— Order unanimously reversed, without costs of this appeal to either party and motion granted, without costs. Memorandum: Under the facts of this case it was an improvident exercise of discretion to deny defendant’s motion. (Appeal from an order of Monroe Special Term denying defendant’s motion for a neurological examination.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, MeClusky, Henry and Noonan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Order unanimously reversed, without costs of this appeal to either party and motion granted, without costs. Memorandum: Under the facts of this case it was an improvident exercise of discretion to deny defendant’s motion. (Appeal from an order of Monroe Special Term denying defendant’s motion for a neurological examination.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, MeClusky, Henry and Noonan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

20 A.D.2d 623, 245 N.Y.S.2d 971, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2741, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weinstein-v-sanford-nyappdiv-1963.