Weinstein v. People

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Weinstein v. People

304 A.D.2d 768, 757 N.Y.S.2d 772, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4340

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 21, 2003

StatusPublished

This text of 304 A.D.2d 768 (Weinstein v. People) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Weinstein v. People, 304 A.D.2d 768, 757 N.Y.S.2d 772, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4340 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to prohibit a risk assessment determination hearing against the petitioner pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Adjudged that those branches of the petition which seek relief in the nature of mandamus and prohibition are dismissed as academic; and it is further,

[769]*769Adjudged that the petition is otherwise denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

To the extent that the petition seeks relief in the nature of mandamus and prohibition, it is academic, as the acts in question have already occurred. The petition otherwise is without merit. Ritter, J.P., Smith, Krausman and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to prohibit a risk assessment determination hearing against the petitioner pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Adjudged that those branches of the petition which seek relief in the nature of mandamus and prohibition are dismissed as academic; and it is further,

[769]*769Adjudged that the petition is otherwise denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

To the extent that the petition seeks relief in the nature of mandamus and prohibition, it is academic, as the acts in question have already occurred. The petition otherwise is without merit. Ritter, J.P., Smith, Krausman and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

304 A.D.2d 768, 757 N.Y.S.2d 772, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4340, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weinstein-v-people-nyappdiv-2003.