Weinstein v. O'Leary

128 A.D. 267, 112 N.Y.S. 641, 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 449
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 23, 1908
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 128 A.D. 267 (Weinstein v. O'Leary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Weinstein v. O'Leary, 128 A.D. 267, 112 N.Y.S. 641, 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 449 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1908).

Opinion

Per Curiam :

The action is for damages to personal property and for injury to the freehold, and is a case in which a bill of particulars is peculiarly appropriate. The plaintiffs have been able to estimate the gross damage which they deem themselves to have suffered, and should find' no difficulty in stating the details thereof.

[268]*268The order appealed from must, therefore, be; reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted except as to the sixth -item of particulars demanded.-

Present — Patterson, P. J., Ingraham, LauGhlin, Clarke and Scott, Jj.

Order reversed, with ten dollars- costs and disbursements, and motion granted except as stated -in opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ferreri v. Dworman Associates, Inc.
34 Misc. 2d 1053 (New York Supreme Court, 1962)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
128 A.D. 267, 112 N.Y.S. 641, 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 449, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weinstein-v-oleary-nyappdiv-1908.