Weinstein v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.

30 A.D.2d 651, 290 N.Y.S.2d 1012, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3774
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 11, 1968·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order, entered December 12, 1967, granting leave to respondent to sue appellant Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation, Unanimously reversed, on the law and on the facts, with $30 costs and disbursements to abide the event, and the matter remanded to Special Term for a hearing. Upon the affidavits presented on the application the court is in no position to evaluate the situation and satisfactorily determine whether in compliance with the statutory mandate a proper report of the hit-and-run ” accident had in fact been made to the police or to a peace officer. (Insurance Law, § 608, subd. [b]; § 618; Matter of Malitz v. MVAIC, 17 A D 2d 108.) Concur— Botein, P. J.; Stevens, Eager, Steuer and Tilzer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Weinstein v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp., 30 A.D.2d 651, 290 N.Y.S.2d 1012, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3774 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

30 A.D.2d 651 (Weinstein v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cordoba v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.
83 A.D.2d 923 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)