Weinstein v. Heyman

379 So. 2d 446, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 15772
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 5, 1980
DocketNo. 79-680
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 379 So. 2d 446 (Weinstein v. Heyman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Weinstein v. Heyman, 379 So. 2d 446, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 15772 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Subsequent to the opinions found in Heyman v. Weinstein, 333 So.2d 548 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); Heyman v. WEKA, Inc., 333 So.2d 550 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); the matter .returned to the trial court and the appellee made an election to secure a judgment solely against Katz, Weinstein, and KAWE, Inc., d/b/a Regent Drugs.

This appeal then ensued and the appellants now urge error in the original trial proceedings in denying the defendant’s motions for directed verdict. We have examined the original trial record in this connection and find no error. Therefore, the final judgment here under review be and the same is hereby affirmed. Belden v. Lynch, 126 So.2d 578 (Fla. 2d DCA 1961); Ranger v. Avis Rent-A-Car System, Inc., 336 So.2d 467 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); Balart v. Michel’s Kartway, Inc., 364 So.2d 90 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Belien
379 So. 2d 446 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
379 So. 2d 446, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 15772, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weinstein-v-heyman-fladistctapp-1980.