Weinstein v. Goldman, Sachs & Co.

Second Circuit

Weinstein v. Goldman, Sachs & Co.

93 F. App'x 326

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided April 1, 2004·No. No. 03-7781·Published

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

Plaintiffs appeal from a June 30, 2003 judgment entered by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Harold Baer, Jr., Judge) dismissing their claim for fraud under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b), and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder by the Securities [327] Exchange Commission, 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5.

We have considered appellants’ arguments on appeal, and we find that they are without merit. Accordingly, the judgment of the District Court is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SUMMARY ORDER

Plaintiffs appeal from a June 30, 2003 judgment entered by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Harold Baer, Jr., Judge) dismissing their claim for fraud under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b), and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder by the Securities [327] Exchange Commission, 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5.

We have considered appellants’ arguments on appeal, and we find that they are without merit. Accordingly, the judgment of the District Court is AFFIRMED.

Weinstein v. Goldman, Sachs & Co., 93 F. App'x 326 (2d Cir. 2004).

Pincite

93 F. App'x 326 (Weinstein v. Goldman, Sachs & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related