Weinstein v. Goldman, Sachs & Co.

Second Circuit

Weinstein v. Goldman, Sachs & Co.

93 F. App'x 326

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedApril 1, 2004

DocketNo. 03-7781

StatusPublished

This text of 93 F. App'x 326 (Weinstein v. Goldman, Sachs & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Weinstein v. Goldman, Sachs & Co., 93 F. App'x 326 (2d Cir. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

Plaintiffs appeal from a June 30, 2003 judgment entered by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Harold Baer, Jr., Judge) dismissing their claim for fraud under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b), and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder by the Securities [327]*327Exchange Commission, 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5.

We have considered appellants’ arguments on appeal, and we find that they are without merit. Accordingly, the judgment of the District Court is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SUMMARY ORDER

Plaintiffs appeal from a June 30, 2003 judgment entered by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Harold Baer, Jr., Judge) dismissing their claim for fraud under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b), and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder by the Securities [327]*327Exchange Commission, 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5.

We have considered appellants’ arguments on appeal, and we find that they are without merit. Accordingly, the judgment of the District Court is AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

93 F. App'x 326, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weinstein-v-goldman-sachs-co-ca2-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack