Weinstein v. City of New York
This text of 174 A.D. 922 (Weinstein v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, [923]*923upon the ground that the ruling of the trial court at folios 367 and 368 was erroneous to the manifest and substantial prejudice of the plaintiff. (See Furst v. Second Avenue Railroad Co., 72 N. Y. 542.) Carr, Stapleton, Mills and Rich, JJ., concurred; Jenks, P. J., dissented.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
174 A.D. 922, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weinstein-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1916.