Weinstein v. City of New York
174 A.D. 922
Opinion
Judgment reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, [923]*923upon the ground that the ruling of the trial court at folios 367 and 368 was erroneous to the manifest and substantial prejudice of the plaintiff. (See Furst v. Second Avenue Railroad Co., 72 N. Y. 542.) Carr, Stapleton, Mills and Rich, JJ., concurred; Jenks, P. J., dissented.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Weinstein v. City of New York, 174 A.D. 922 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).
174 A.D. 922 (Weinstein v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Furst v. . Second Avenue Railroad Company
72 N.Y. 542 (New York Court of Appeals, 1878)