Weinman v. Powell
This text of 254 A.D. 907 (Weinman v. Powell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action by an employee of a tenant against the owner of a building for damages for personal injuries caused by a defect in the chains controlling the opening and closing of a window, judgment for defendants, and order denying motion to set aside the judgment and for a new trial, unanimously affirmed, with costs. (Fink v. 37 West 36th Street Company, 277 N. Y. 703.) Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Taylor, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
254 A.D. 907, 6 N.Y.S.2d 506, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8262, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weinman-v-powell-nyappdiv-1938.