Weinland v. Fulton

Ohio Supreme Court

Weinland v. Fulton

99 Ohio St. (N.S.) 10

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedSeptember 10, 1918

DocketNo. 16071

StatusPublished

This text of 99 Ohio St. (N.S.) 10 (Weinland v. Fulton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Weinland v. Fulton, 99 Ohio St. (N.S.) 10 (Ohio 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court.

In an action to enjoin the Secretary of State from submitting for the approval or rejection of the electors a constitutional amendment proposed by petition in pursuance of the provisions of Section 1 and Section 1a of Article II of the Constitution of Ohio, a court can not consider or determine whether such proposed amendment is in conflict with the Constitution of the United States. (Pfeifer et al. v. Graves, Secretary of State, 88 Ohio St., 473, approved and followed.)

Judgment affirmed.

Nichols, C. J., Wanamaker, Newman, Jones, Matthias, Johnson and Donahue, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court.

In an action to enjoin the Secretary of State from submitting for the approval or rejection of the electors a constitutional amendment proposed by petition in pursuance of the provisions of Section 1 and Section 1a of Article II of the Constitution of Ohio, a court can not consider or determine whether such proposed amendment is in conflict with the Constitution of the United States. (Pfeifer et al. v. Graves, Secretary of State, 88 Ohio St., 473, approved and followed.)

Judgment affirmed.

Nichols, C. J., Wanamaker, Newman, Jones, Matthias, Johnson and Donahue, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

99 Ohio St. (N.S.) 10, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weinland-v-fulton-ohio-1918.