Weinkrantze v. Humboldt Library

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Weinkrantze v. Humboldt Library

32 Misc. 709, 65 N.Y.S. 512

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1900

StatusPublished

This text of 32 Misc. 709 (Weinkrantze v. Humboldt Library) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Weinkrantze v. Humboldt Library, 32 Misc. 709, 65 N.Y.S. 512 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

As the appellant’s only point is that the plaintiff failed to prove any excuse for his nonperformance of the contracts that would entitle him to recover for his services on the unfinished books, and as the evidence tends to show that work upon the contract of October sixth was stopped by the defendant, the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Present: Truax, P. J., Scott and Dugro, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

As the appellant’s only point is that the plaintiff failed to prove any excuse for his nonperformance of the contracts that would entitle him to recover for his services on the unfinished books, and as the evidence tends to show that work upon the contract of October sixth was stopped by the defendant, the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Present: Truax, P. J., Scott and Dugro, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

32 Misc. 709, 65 N.Y.S. 512, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weinkrantze-v-humboldt-library-nyappterm-1900.