Weining v. Sellitto

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Weining v. Sellitto

192 A. 233, 121 N.J. Eq. 613, 1937 N.J. LEXIS 563

CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey

DecidedApril 30, 1937

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 192 A. 233 (Weining v. Sellitto) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Weining v. Sellitto, 192 A. 233, 121 N.J. Eq. 613, 1937 N.J. LEXIS 563 (N.J. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Our examination of the proofs taken in the court below convinces us that the order setting aside the decree pro confesso as against the infant Spenzierato, appointing a guardian and permitting an answer to be filed and awarding a counsel fee to the petitioner, was properly entered and it is therefore affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenohard, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Eafferty, Cole, JJ. 13. For reversal — Parker, Heher, JJ. 2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Our examination of the proofs taken in the court below convinces us that the order setting aside the decree pro confesso as against the infant Spenzierato, appointing a guardian and permitting an answer to be filed and awarding a counsel fee to the petitioner, was properly entered and it is therefore affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenohard, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Eafferty, Cole, JJ. 13. For reversal — Parker, Heher, JJ. 2.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

192 A. 233, 121 N.J. Eq. 613, 1937 N.J. LEXIS 563, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weining-v-sellitto-nj-1937.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack