Weining v. Sellitto

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Weining v. Sellitto

192 A. 233, 121 N.J. Eq. 613, 1937 N.J. LEXIS 563

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided April 30, 1937·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Our examination of the proofs taken in the court below convinces us that the order setting aside the decree pro confesso as against the infant Spenzierato, appointing a guardian and permitting an answer to be filed and awarding a counsel fee to the petitioner, was properly entered and it is therefore affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenohard, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Eafferty, Cole, JJ. 13. For reversal — Parker, Heher, JJ. 2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Our examination of the proofs taken in the court below convinces us that the order setting aside the decree pro confesso as against the infant Spenzierato, appointing a guardian and permitting an answer to be filed and awarding a counsel fee to the petitioner, was properly entered and it is therefore affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenohard, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Eafferty, Cole, JJ. 13. For reversal — Parker, Heher, JJ. 2.

Weining v. Sellitto, 192 A. 233, 121 N.J. Eq. 613, 1937 N.J. LEXIS 563 (N.J. 1937).

Pincite

192 A. 233 (Weining v. Sellitto) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related