Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Weingrad v. Amerco Marketing Co.

Weingrad v. Amerco Marketing Co.

194 S.E.2d 269, 127 Ga. App. 521, 1972 Ga. App. LEXIS 936
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedNovember 9, 1972
Docket47425
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 194 S.E.2d 269 (Weingrad v. Amerco Marketing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Weingrad v. Amerco Marketing Co., 194 S.E.2d 269, 127 Ga. App. 521, 1972 Ga. App. LEXIS 936 (Ga. Ct. App. 1972).

Opinion

Bell, Chief Judge.

In this action on account plaintiff’s exhibits which established the account and the amount due and owing by defendant were admitted over objection. This documentary evidence purports to emanate from Arcoa, Inc. The president of the plaintiff corporation testified by way of foundation for the admission of this evidence that Arcoa, Inc. is a subsidiary which performs the accounting and bookkeeping function for the plaintiff. This evidence under this showing was relevant and admissible and authorized the trial judge, hearing the case without a jury, to find for the plaintiff.

Judgment affirmed.

Evans and Stolz, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Record Data, Inc. v. Vinylgrain Industries of Georgia, Inc.
240 S.E.2d 223 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
194 S.E.2d 269, 127 Ga. App. 521, 1972 Ga. App. LEXIS 936, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weingrad-v-amerco-marketing-co-gactapp-1972.