Weingarten v. Hartford Fire Insurance

New York Court of Appeals

Weingarten v. Hartford Fire Insurance

162 N.E. 549, 248 N.Y. 620, 1928 N.Y. LEXIS 1442

DecidedJune 21, 1928

StatusPublished

This text of 162 N.E. 549 (Weingarten v. Hartford Fire Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Weingarten v. Hartford Fire Insurance, 162 N.E. 549, 248 N.Y. 620, 1928 N.Y. LEXIS 1442 (N.Y. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

In each action order of the Appellate Division reversed and judgment of the Trial Term affirmed, with costs in the Appellate Division and in this court, upon the ground that the evidence presented a question of fact for the consideration of the jury and that there was no error of law to sustain the reversal by the Appellate Division, which reversal was upon the law and not upon the facts. No opinion.

Concur: Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Andrews, Lehman, Kedlogg and O’Brien, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In each action order of the Appellate Division reversed and judgment of the Trial Term affirmed, with costs in the Appellate Division and in this court, upon the ground that the evidence presented a question of fact for the consideration of the jury and that there was no error of law to sustain the reversal by the Appellate Division, which reversal was upon the law and not upon the facts. No opinion.

Concur: Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Andrews, Lehman, Kedlogg and O’Brien, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

162 N.E. 549, 248 N.Y. 620, 1928 N.Y. LEXIS 1442, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weingarten-v-hartford-fire-insurance-ny-1928.