Weingarten v. Hartford Fire Insurance

New York Court of Appeals

Weingarten v. Hartford Fire Insurance

162 N.E. 549, 248 N.Y. 620, 1928 N.Y. LEXIS 1442

New York Court of Appeals·Decided June 21, 1928·Published

Opinion

In each action order of the Appellate Division reversed and judgment of the Trial Term affirmed, with costs in the Appellate Division and in this court, upon the ground that the evidence presented a question of fact for the consideration of the jury and that there was no error of law to sustain the reversal by the Appellate Division, which reversal was upon the law and not upon the facts. No opinion.

Concur: Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Andrews, Lehman, Kedlogg and O’Brien, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In each action order of the Appellate Division reversed and judgment of the Trial Term affirmed, with costs in the Appellate Division and in this court, upon the ground that the evidence presented a question of fact for the consideration of the jury and that there was no error of law to sustain the reversal by the Appellate Division, which reversal was upon the law and not upon the facts. No opinion.

Concur: Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Andrews, Lehman, Kedlogg and O’Brien, JJ.

Weingarten v. Hartford Fire Insurance, 162 N.E. 549, 248 N.Y. 620, 1928 N.Y. LEXIS 1442 (N.Y. 1928).

Pincite

162 N.E. 549 (Weingarten v. Hartford Fire Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.