Weingarten v. Bouthellet

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Weingarten v. Bouthellet

256 A.D. 943, 11 N.Y.S.2d 227, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5552

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 17, 1939·Published

Opinion

Action upon a past due promissory note. The defense interposed was that the claim had been duly listed in bankruptcy proceedings and that the defendants were duly discharged from the debt in suit. Order granting plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment under rule 113, Rules of Civil Practice, and judgment entered thereon, unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Close, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action upon a past due promissory note. The defense interposed was that the claim had been duly listed in bankruptcy proceedings and that the defendants were duly discharged from the debt in suit. Order granting plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment under rule 113, Rules of Civil Practice, and judgment entered thereon, unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Close, JJ.

Weingarten v. Bouthellet, 256 A.D. 943, 11 N.Y.S.2d 227, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5552 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

256 A.D. 943 (Weingarten v. Bouthellet) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.