Weingart v. Varisano
This text of 205 A.D.2d 617 (Weingart v. Varisano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Roberto, J.), dated September 16, 1992, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Contrary to the defendant’s contentions, we find that the affidavit submitted by the plaintiff’s treating physician, Dr. Ernest C. Chisena, is sufficient to create an issue of fact as to whether the plaintiff sustained a serious injury under Insurance Law § 5102 (d). Mangano, P. J., Balletta, O’Brien, Hart and Florio, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
205 A.D.2d 617, 614 N.Y.S.2d 288, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6204, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weingart-v-varisano-nyappdiv-1994.