Weingart v. Directoire Restaurant, Inc.
This text of 75 Misc. 2d 1004 (Weingart v. Directoire Restaurant, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The agreed statement of facts was insufficient to permit a determination of the issues. The express, implied or apparent authority of Buster Douglas, and the question of whether plaintiff acted with reasonable prudence are matters which should be fully explored at a trial.
The judgment should be reversed and new trial ordered with ~$30 costs to abide the event; appeal from decision dismissed.
Concur — Fine, J. P., Lupiano and Quinn, JJ.
Judgment reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
75 Misc. 2d 1004, 350 N.Y.S.2d 367, 1973 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1398, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weingart-v-directoire-restaurant-inc-nyappterm-1973.