Weingarden v. Weinberg

203 Ill. App. 228, 1917 Ill. App. LEXIS 186
Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided January 15, 1917·No. Gen. No. 22,728·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Mr. Justice Holdom

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Municipal Coubt of Chicago, § 26*—how facts in a case of first class may he preserved for review. The Practice Act, sec. 81 (J. & A. If 8618), providing for preserving of facts in a cause for review by a bill of exceptions, stenographic report and certificate of evidence, governs first-class cases in the Municipal Court. 3. Municipal Coubt of Chicago § 29*—tphen presumed that judgment is sustained hy evidence. Without a bill of exceptions, certificate of evidence or stenographic report certifying that it contains all of the evidence heard upon the trial of a first-class case in the Municipal Court, unless such record is a prcecipe record, a court of review will presume that the judgment is sustained by the evidence heard upon the trial, and such judgment will not be disturbed upon review for errors of fact.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Weingarden v. Weinberg, 203 Ill. App. 228, 1917 Ill. App. LEXIS 186 (Ill. Ct. App. 1917).

203 Ill. App. 228 (Weingarden v. Weinberg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Doretti v. George E. Rice Potato Co.
210 Ill. App. 300 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1918)