Weingarden v. Weinberg

Appellate Court of Illinois

Weingarden v. Weinberg

203 Ill. App. 228, 1917 Ill. App. LEXIS 186

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedJanuary 15, 1917

DocketGen. No. 22,728

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 203 Ill. App. 228 (Weingarden v. Weinberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Weingarden v. Weinberg, 203 Ill. App. 228, 1917 Ill. App. LEXIS 186 (Ill. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Holdom

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Municipal Coubt of Chicago, § 26*—how facts in a case of first class may he preserved for review. The Practice Act, sec. 81 (J. & A. If 8618), providing for preserving of facts in a cause for review by a bill of exceptions, stenographic report and certificate of evidence, governs first-class cases in the Municipal Court. 3. Municipal Coubt of Chicago § 29*—tphen presumed that judgment is sustained hy evidence. Without a bill of exceptions, certificate of evidence or stenographic report certifying that it contains all of the evidence heard upon the trial of a first-class case in the Municipal Court, unless such record is a prcecipe record, a court of review will presume that the judgment is sustained by the evidence heard upon the trial, and such judgment will not be disturbed upon review for errors of fact.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Holdom

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Municipal Coubt of Chicago, § 26*—how facts in a case of first class may he preserved for review. The Practice Act, sec. 81 (J. & A. If 8618), providing for preserving of facts in a cause for review by a bill of exceptions, stenographic report and certificate of evidence, governs first-class cases in the Municipal Court. 3. Municipal Coubt of Chicago § 29*—tphen presumed that judgment is sustained hy evidence. Without a bill of exceptions, certificate of evidence or stenographic report certifying that it contains all of the evidence heard upon the trial of a first-class case in the Municipal Court, unless such record is a prcecipe record, a court of review will presume that the judgment is sustained by the evidence heard upon the trial, and such judgment will not be disturbed upon review for errors of fact.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

203 Ill. App. 228, 1917 Ill. App. LEXIS 186, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weingarden-v-weinberg-illappct-1917.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack