Weinfeld v. Hillside Housing Corp.

261 A.D. 940, 25 N.Y.S.2d 762
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 7, 1941
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 261 A.D. 940 (Weinfeld v. Hillside Housing Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Weinfeld v. Hillside Housing Corp., 261 A.D. 940, 25 N.Y.S.2d 762 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Opinion

O’Malley, J.

The question presented is legally similar to that in Weinfeld v. Knickerbocker Village, Inc. (261 App. Div. 383), decided herewith.

For the reasons indicated in Weinfeld v. Knickerbocker Village, Inc. (supra), judgment is directed for the defendant, but without costs.

Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon and Untermyer, JJ., concur.

Judgment unanimously directed for defendant, without costs. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Opn. No.
New York Attorney General Reports, 1991
Bosco v. County of Oneida
106 Misc. 2d 872 (New York Supreme Court, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
261 A.D. 940, 25 N.Y.S.2d 762, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weinfeld-v-hillside-housing-corp-nyappdiv-1941.