Weinert v. Kinkel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Weinert v. Kinkel

251 A.D. 792, 298 N.Y.S. 168, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7556

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 26, 1937·Published

Opinion

Order, so far as appealed from, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. All concur. (The portion of the order appealed from directs examination of defendants before trial and postpones plaintiffs’ furnishing of a full bill of particulars until after the examination of defendants in an action to restore value of stock.) Present — Sears, P. J., Edgcomb, Lewis, Cunningham and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, so far as appealed from, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. All concur. (The portion of the order appealed from directs examination of defendants before trial and postpones plaintiffs’ furnishing of a full bill of particulars until after the examination of defendants in an action to restore value of stock.) Present — Sears, P. J., Edgcomb, Lewis, Cunningham and Taylor, JJ.

Weinert v. Kinkel, 251 A.D. 792, 298 N.Y.S. 168, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7556 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

251 A.D. 792 (Weinert v. Kinkel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.