Weinert v. Kinkel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Weinert v. Kinkel

251 A.D. 792, 298 N.Y.S. 168, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7556

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 26, 1937

StatusPublished

This text of 251 A.D. 792 (Weinert v. Kinkel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Weinert v. Kinkel, 251 A.D. 792, 298 N.Y.S. 168, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7556 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, so far as appealed from, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. All concur. (The portion of the order appealed from directs examination of defendants before trial and postpones plaintiffs’ furnishing of a full bill of particulars until after the examination of defendants in an action to restore value of stock.) Present — Sears, P. J., Edgcomb, Lewis, Cunningham and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, so far as appealed from, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. All concur. (The portion of the order appealed from directs examination of defendants before trial and postpones plaintiffs’ furnishing of a full bill of particulars until after the examination of defendants in an action to restore value of stock.) Present — Sears, P. J., Edgcomb, Lewis, Cunningham and Taylor, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

251 A.D. 792, 298 N.Y.S. 168, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7556, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weinert-v-kinkel-nyappdiv-1937.