Weiner v. Weiner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Weiner v. Weiner

44 A.D.2d 728, 354 N.Y.S.2d 1015, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5166

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 29, 1974

StatusPublished

This text of 44 A.D.2d 728 (Weiner v. Weiner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Weiner v. Weiner, 44 A.D.2d 728, 354 N.Y.S.2d 1015, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5166 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action in which a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, was- entered granting the plaintiff wife a divorce, defendant appeals from an order of the same court, dated October 12, 1973, which, .upon plaintiff’s motion, increased the alimony contained in the judgment from $45 per week to $75 per week. Order modified, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, by striking the figure of $75 in the decretal paragraph thereof and substituting therefor the figure of $60. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs. The increased alimony award was excessive to the extent indicated herein. Gulotta, P. J., Hopkins, Latham, Shapiro and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action in which a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, was- entered granting the plaintiff wife a divorce, defendant appeals from an order of the same court, dated October 12, 1973, which, .upon plaintiff’s motion, increased the alimony contained in the judgment from $45 per week to $75 per week. Order modified, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, by striking the figure of $75 in the decretal paragraph thereof and substituting therefor the figure of $60. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs. The increased alimony award was excessive to the extent indicated herein. Gulotta, P. J., Hopkins, Latham, Shapiro and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

44 A.D.2d 728, 354 N.Y.S.2d 1015, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5166, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weiner-v-weiner-nyappdiv-1974.