Weiner v. Valentine

260 A.D. 999, 23 N.Y.S.2d 866
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 13, 1940·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

Pee Cttbiam.

The nature of this case makes it somewhat difficult to plead the facts in great detail. We are of the opinion, however, that the allegations contained in the complaint here under consideration are sufficient.

The order, so far as appealed from, should be affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to the defendant to answer within ten days after service of order with notice of entry thereof, on payment of said costs.

Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon and Callahan, JJ., concur; Dore, J., dissents and votes to reverse and dismiss the complaint.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Weiner v. Valentine, 260 A.D. 999, 23 N.Y.S.2d 866 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

260 A.D. 999 (Weiner v. Valentine) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fulton Cama, Inc. v. Trustees of Farmingdale
72 A.D.2d 813 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)
Schwartzberg v. Wallander
190 Misc. 236 (New York Supreme Court, 1947)