Weiner v. State
This text of 89 A.D.3d 953 (Weiner v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
As the temporary order of protection at issue in this case has been vacated, any determination by this Court will not directly affect the rights of the parties (see Festa v Festa, 76 AD3d 1047, [954]*9541047-1048 [2010]; Matter of Bucaro v Morales, 62 AD3d 994, 995 [2009]). Since the matter does not warrant the invocation of the exception to the mootness doctrine (see Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707, 714 [1980]), the appeal must be dismissed as academic (see Matter of Bucaro v Morales, 62 AD3d at 995). Rivera, J.E, Dickerson, Eng and Roman, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
89 A.D.3d 953, 932 N.Y.2d 725, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weiner-v-state-nyappdiv-2011.