Weiner v. Hein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Weiner v. Hein

47 A.D.2d 551, 364 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8619

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 20, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 47 A.D.2d 551 (Weiner v. Hein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Weiner v. Hein, 47 A.D.2d 551, 364 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8619 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding to increase the amount now being paid to petitioner for the support of Edward T. Hein, the minor issue of the parties’ marriage, pursuant to a Mexican divorce decree into which a separation agreement was incorporated by reference, the appeal is from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, FTassau County, entered March 19, 1974, after a nonjury trial, as increased the amount of support, after a hearing. Order modified, on the facts, by deleting the figure “ $175.00 ” from the second and third decretal paragraphs thereof and substituting therefor the figure “ $140 ”. As so modified, order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs. The amount of the increase in support [552]*552was excessive to the extent indicated herein. Martuscello, Acting P. J., Latham, Cohalan, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding to increase the amount now being paid to petitioner for the support of Edward T. Hein, the minor issue of the parties’ marriage, pursuant to a Mexican divorce decree into which a separation agreement was incorporated by reference, the appeal is from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, FTassau County, entered March 19, 1974, after a nonjury trial, as increased the amount of support, after a hearing. Order modified, on the facts, by deleting the figure “ $175.00 ” from the second and third decretal paragraphs thereof and substituting therefor the figure “ $140 ”. As so modified, order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs. The amount of the increase in support [552]*552was excessive to the extent indicated herein. Martuscello, Acting P. J., Latham, Cohalan, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

47 A.D.2d 551, 364 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8619, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weiner-v-hein-nyappdiv-1975.