Weiner Bros. v. Tucker
77 S.E. 811, 139 Ga. 596, 1913 Ga. LEXIS 529
This text of 77 S.E. 811 (Weiner Bros. v. Tucker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Weiner Bros. v. Tucker, 77 S.E. 811, 139 Ga. 596, 1913 Ga. LEXIS 529 (Ga. 1913).
Opinion
1. Agency can not be proved by evidence of mere declarations of the alleged agent; but when accompanied by other evidence as to the conduct of the person in the character of agent, and acceptance ' by the alleged- principal of the fruits of the agency, such declarations are admissible in evidence.
2. The evidence authorized the verdict.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Hudson v. Santangelo
492 S.E.2d 673 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1997)
Clark v. Atlanta Veterans Transportation, Inc.
148 S.E.2d 921 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1966)
Puckett v. Reese
48 S.E.2d 297 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1948)
Lawhon v. Henshaw
11 S.E.2d 846 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1940)
Wofford Oil Co. v. Story
183 S.E. 840 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1936)
Glover v. Summerour
141 S.E. 211 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1928)
William Hester Marble Co. v. Walton
96 S.E. 269 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)
Power v. Garrison
81 S.E. 225 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1914)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
77 S.E. 811, 139 Ga. 596, 1913 Ga. LEXIS 529, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weiner-bros-v-tucker-ga-1913.