Weinberger v. Weinberger

Ohio Supreme Court

Weinberger v. Weinberger

698 N.E.2d 1008, 83 Ohio St. 3d 1420, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 2331

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedSeptember 2, 1998

Docket98-1281

StatusPublished

This text of 698 N.E.2d 1008 (Weinberger v. Weinberger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Weinberger v. Weinberger, 698 N.E.2d 1008, 83 Ohio St. 3d 1420, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 2331 (Ohio 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

Hamilton App. No. C-970552. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and cross-appeal. On July 29, 1998, appellee/eross-appellant filed a memorandum in support of jurisdiction of cross-appeal and in response to appellani/cross-appellee’s memorandum, which was due July 27, 1998. Whereas S.CtPrac.R. XIV(1)(C) prohibits the filing of a document after the filing deadline has passed,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that appellee/cross-appellant’s combined memorandum be, and hereby is, stricken.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the cross-appeal of Barrett Weinberger be, and hereby is, dismissed.

The appeal of Cathy F. Weinberger remains pending.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hamilton App. No. C-970552. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and cross-appeal. On July 29, 1998, appellee/eross-appellant filed a memorandum in support of jurisdiction of cross-appeal and in response to appellani/cross-appellee’s memorandum, which was due July 27, 1998. Whereas S.CtPrac.R. XIV(1)(C) prohibits the filing of a document after the filing deadline has passed,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that appellee/cross-appellant’s combined memorandum be, and hereby is, stricken.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the cross-appeal of Barrett Weinberger be, and hereby is, dismissed.

The appeal of Cathy F. Weinberger remains pending.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

698 N.E.2d 1008, 83 Ohio St. 3d 1420, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 2331, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weinberger-v-weinberger-ohio-1998.