Weinberger v. Weinberger

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Weinberger v. Weinberger

550 So. 2d 622, 1989 La. LEXIS 2354, 1989 WL 119921

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedOctober 13, 1989

DocketNo. 89-CC-2342

StatusPublished

This text of 550 So. 2d 622 (Weinberger v. Weinberger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Weinberger v. Weinberger, 550 So. 2d 622, 1989 La. LEXIS 2354, 1989 WL 119921 (La. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Weinberger, Bernhard S.; — Defendants); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court, Domestic Relations # 2, Div. “G”, No. 87-23524; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 89CW 1773.

Granted in part; denied in part. Stay order recalled. The case is remanded to the district court to amend the judgment by placing Bernhard Weinberger on probation on the conditions that he make monthly payments to repay the accumulated arrear-ages on a reasonable schedule to be determined by the trial judge and that the prison sentence will be deemed purged when all accumulated arrearages for which he was found in contempt are paid. Otherwise,i denied. See, Hicks on behalf of Feiock v. Feiock, 485 U.S. 624, 108 S.Ct. 1423, 99 L.Ed.2d 721 (1988).

COLE, J., would deny the writ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Weinberger, Bernhard S.; — Defendants); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court, Domestic Relations # 2, Div. “G”, No. 87-23524; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 89CW 1773.

Granted in part; denied in part. Stay order recalled. The case is remanded to the district court to amend the judgment by placing Bernhard Weinberger on probation on the conditions that he make monthly payments to repay the accumulated arrear-ages on a reasonable schedule to be determined by the trial judge and that the prison sentence will be deemed purged when all accumulated arrearages for which he was found in contempt are paid. Otherwise,i denied. See, Hicks on behalf of Feiock v. Feiock, 485 U.S. 624, 108 S.Ct. 1423, 99 L.Ed.2d 721 (1988).

COLE, J., would deny the writ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

550 So. 2d 622, 1989 La. LEXIS 2354, 1989 WL 119921, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weinberger-v-weinberger-la-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack