Weinberger v. Friedman

14 Pa. D. & C. 510, 1930 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 458
CourtPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County
DecidedMarch 7, 1930
DocketNo. 243
StatusPublished

This text of 14 Pa. D. & C. 510 (Weinberger v. Friedman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Weinberger v. Friedman, 14 Pa. D. & C. 510, 1930 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 458 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1930).

Opinion

Newcomb, P. J.,

The question is on the regularity of the proceedings had by a justice of the peace.

On plaintiff’s claim of $50 judgment was entered against defendant “for the sum of $50 and $8.50 costs.”

This was erroneous. Costs are recoverable only as an incident to a judgment. They can not be both an incident to and also an integral part of the judgment debt: Garey and Pender v. Redmond, 4 Lacka. Jurist, 52.

This ground of objection is fatal and the other exceptions may be disregarded.

Judgment reversed.

From William A. Wilcox, Scranton, Pa.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
14 Pa. D. & C. 510, 1930 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 458, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weinberger-v-friedman-pactcompllackaw-1930.