Weinberger v. Friedman

14 Pa. D. & C. 510, 1930 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 458
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County·Decided March 7, 1930·No. No. 243·Published

Opinion

Newcomb, P. J.,

The question is on the regularity of the proceedings had by a justice of the peace.

On plaintiff’s claim of $50 judgment was entered against defendant “for the sum of $50 and $8.50 costs.”

This was erroneous. Costs are recoverable only as an incident to a judgment. They can not be both an incident to and also an integral part of the judgment debt: Garey and Pender v. Redmond, 4 Lacka. Jurist, 52.

This ground of objection is fatal and the other exceptions may be disregarded.

Judgment reversed.

From William A. Wilcox, Scranton, Pa.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Weinberger v. Friedman, 14 Pa. D. & C. 510, 1930 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 458 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1930).

14 Pa. D. & C. 510 (Weinberger v. Friedman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.