Weinberg v. Weinberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Weinberg v. Weinberg

27 A.D.2d 543, 276 N.Y.S.2d 575, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2957

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 5, 1966

StatusPublished

This text of 27 A.D.2d 543 (Weinberg v. Weinberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Weinberg v. Weinberg, 27 A.D.2d 543, 276 N.Y.S.2d 575, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2957 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated July 13, 1966, dismissed as academic, without costs. That order was superseded by the subsequent order granting reargument and adhering to the court’s original decision. Order of said court, dated September 19, 1966, modified (1) by decreasing the amount of temporary alimony awarded in its fourth decretal paragraph from $150 to $100 per week and (2) by deleting so much of its eighth decretal paragraph as provides that defendant pay for telephone expenses. As so modified, order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs. In our opinion, the award of temporary alimony was excessive to the extent indicated. The best interests of the parties will be served by a prompt trial of the action. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Brennan and Hill, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated July 13, 1966, dismissed as academic, without costs. That order was superseded by the subsequent order granting reargument and adhering to the court’s original decision. Order of said court, dated September 19, 1966, modified (1) by decreasing the amount of temporary alimony awarded in its fourth decretal paragraph from $150 to $100 per week and (2) by deleting so much of its eighth decretal paragraph as provides that defendant pay for telephone expenses. As so modified, order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs. In our opinion, the award of temporary alimony was excessive to the extent indicated. The best interests of the parties will be served by a prompt trial of the action. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Brennan and Hill, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

27 A.D.2d 543, 276 N.Y.S.2d 575, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2957, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weinberg-v-weinberg-nyappdiv-1966.