Weinberg v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Weinberg v. State

140 So. 782, 104 Fla. 712

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided April 12, 1932·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

—This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and upon motion of the Attorney General to affirm the said judgment, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Criminal Court of Record be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Buford, C.J., and Whitfield and Davis, J.J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

—This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and upon motion of the Attorney General to affirm the said judgment, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Criminal Court of Record be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Buford, C.J., and Whitfield and Davis, J.J., concur.

Weinberg v. State, 140 So. 782, 104 Fla. 712 (Fla. 1932).

Pincite

140 So. 782 (Weinberg v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.