Weinberg v. Serota

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Weinberg v. Serota

241 A.D. 891

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1934·Published

Opinion

As to plaintiffs Abraham Weinberg and Sarah Weiss judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs. As to plaintiff Betty Weinberg, judgment reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event, unless said plaintiff, within five days from the entry of the order herein, stipulate to reduce the verdict to the sum of $20,000; in which event the judgment as so modified is unanimously affirmed, without costs. Young, Hagarty, Carswell, Scudder and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

As to plaintiffs Abraham Weinberg and Sarah Weiss judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs. As to plaintiff Betty Weinberg, judgment reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event, unless said plaintiff, within five days from the entry of the order herein, stipulate to reduce the verdict to the sum of $20,000; in which event the judgment as so modified is unanimously affirmed, without costs. Young, Hagarty, Carswell, Scudder and Davis, JJ., concur.

Weinberg v. Serota, 241 A.D. 891 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

241 A.D. 891 (Weinberg v. Serota) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.