Weinberg v. Serota
This text of 241 A.D. 891 (Weinberg v. Serota) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
As to plaintiffs Abraham Weinberg and Sarah Weiss judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs. As to plaintiff Betty Weinberg, judgment reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event, unless said plaintiff, within five days from the entry of the order herein, stipulate to reduce the verdict to the sum of $20,000; in which event the judgment as so modified is unanimously affirmed, without costs. Young, Hagarty, Carswell, Scudder and Davis, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
241 A.D. 891, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weinberg-v-serota-nyappdiv-1934.