Weinberg v. Royal Farms Allied, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Weinberg v. Royal Farms Allied, Inc.

27 A.D.2d 733, 279 N.Y.S.2d 157, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4916

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 6, 1967

StatusPublished

This text of 27 A.D.2d 733 (Weinberg v. Royal Farms Allied, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Weinberg v. Royal Farms Allied, Inc., 27 A.D.2d 733, 279 N.Y.S.2d 157, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4916 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated November 9, 1966, affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs. No opinion. Appeal from judgment of said court, dated April 25, 1966, dismissed, without costs. That appeal may be deemed abandoned and, in any event, that judgment was superseded by the judgment dated November 9, 1966. Ughetta, Christ and Rabin, JJ., concur; Beldoek, P. J., and Brennan, J., concur in the dismissal of the appeal from the original judgment, but dissent from the affirmance of the judgment dated November 9, 1966, and vote to reverse said judgment insofar as appealed from and to remit the proceeding to the respondent State Liquor Authority for further proceedings consistent with the determination of the Court of Appeals in Matter of Forman v. New York State Liq. Auth. (17 N Y 2d 224), with the following memorandum: We are of the opinion that as in Forman, the record before the Authority fails to disclose how public convenience and [734]*734advantage will be promoted by the issuance of a retail liquor store license to respondent Royal Farms Allied, Inc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated November 9, 1966, affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs. No opinion. Appeal from judgment of said court, dated April 25, 1966, dismissed, without costs. That appeal may be deemed abandoned and, in any event, that judgment was superseded by the judgment dated November 9, 1966. Ughetta, Christ and Rabin, JJ., concur; Beldoek, P. J., and Brennan, J., concur in the dismissal of the appeal from the original judgment, but dissent from the affirmance of the judgment dated November 9, 1966, and vote to reverse said judgment insofar as appealed from and to remit the proceeding to the respondent State Liquor Authority for further proceedings consistent with the determination of the Court of Appeals in Matter of Forman v. New York State Liq. Auth. (17 N Y 2d 224), with the following memorandum: We are of the opinion that as in Forman, the record before the Authority fails to disclose how public convenience and [734]*734advantage will be promoted by the issuance of a retail liquor store license to respondent Royal Farms Allied, Inc.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

27 A.D.2d 733, 279 N.Y.S.2d 157, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4916, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weinberg-v-royal-farms-allied-inc-nyappdiv-1967.