Weinberg v. Putney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Weinberg v. Putney

13 A.D.2d 1016, 216 N.Y.S.2d 392, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10151

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 19, 1961

StatusPublished

This text of 13 A.D.2d 1016 (Weinberg v. Putney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Weinberg v. Putney, 13 A.D.2d 1016, 216 N.Y.S.2d 392, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10151 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, plain[1017]*1017tiff appeals, on the ground of inadequacy, from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered June 9, 1960, in his favor against defendants in the sum of $1,000 upon an assessment of damages by the court, without a jury, pursuant to an order granting judgment to plaintiff. Judgment modified on the facts by increasing' to $2,000 the amount of the award for plaintiff’s damages. As so modified, the judgment is affirmed, with costs. Fin dings of fact inconsistent herewith are reversed and new findings are made as indicated herein. In our opinion, the award of $1,000 was inadequate. Beldock, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld and Pette, JJ., concur; Ughetta and Christ, JJ., dissent and vote to affirm without modification.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, plain[1017]*1017tiff appeals, on the ground of inadequacy, from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered June 9, 1960, in his favor against defendants in the sum of $1,000 upon an assessment of damages by the court, without a jury, pursuant to an order granting judgment to plaintiff. Judgment modified on the facts by increasing' to $2,000 the amount of the award for plaintiff’s damages. As so modified, the judgment is affirmed, with costs. Fin dings of fact inconsistent herewith are reversed and new findings are made as indicated herein. In our opinion, the award of $1,000 was inadequate. Beldock, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld and Pette, JJ., concur; Ughetta and Christ, JJ., dissent and vote to affirm without modification.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 A.D.2d 1016, 216 N.Y.S.2d 392, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10151, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weinberg-v-putney-nyappdiv-1961.