Weinberg v. Pretto
This text of 93 A.D.2d 860 (Weinberg v. Pretto) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Wager, J.), dated April 29,1981, which denied their motion, inter alia, to set aside the verdict and grant a new trial. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. It cannot be said that the trial court abused its discretion in not admitting the hospital record since it would have been cumulative in light of the testimony of Officer Moore and defendant Donald Pretto. Mollen, P. J., Damiani, Titone and Mangano, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
93 A.D.2d 860, 460 N.Y.S.2d 1020, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17727, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weinberg-v-pretto-nyappdiv-1983.