Weinberg v. National Football League Players Ass'n

286 F. App'x 215
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedAugust 7, 2008
Docket07-10765
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 286 F. App'x 215 (Weinberg v. National Football League Players Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Weinberg v. National Football League Players Ass'n, 286 F. App'x 215 (5th Cir. 2008).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Plaintiff-Appellant Steve Weinberg argues that the district court erred when it granted the motion to compel arbitration and to dismiss the petition filed by Defendants-Appellees National Football League Players Association (“NFLPA”), Richard Berthleson, Gene Upshaw, Tom DePaso, Trace Armstrong, John Collins, Keith Washington, Tony Agnone, Howard Shat-sky, and Mark Levin. Having reviewed the briefs, heard oral argument, and considered the record, we agree with the district court that all of Weinberg’s claims against the aforementioned Defendants-Appellees fall within the scope of the arbitration clause in Section 5 of the NFLPA Regulations. Accordingly, we AFFIRM the grant of the motion. However, we VACATE the district court’s order regarding Defendant-Appellee Roger Kaplan, and we INSTRUCT the district court to consider Kaplan’s motion to dismiss on remand.

AFFIRMED IN PART, VACATED IN PART, REMANDED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
286 F. App'x 215, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weinberg-v-national-football-league-players-assn-ca5-2008.