Weinberg v. Geico General Ins. Co.
This text of Weinberg v. Geico General Ins. Co. (Weinberg v. Geico General Ins. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed March 15, 2017. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D15-1544 Lower Tribunal No. 13-28096 ________________
Brett Weinberg, Appellant,
vs.
GEICO General Insurance Company, Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Rosa I. Rodriguez, Judge.
Bushell Law, P.A., and Daniel A. Bushell (Fort Lauderdale); Scott J. Edwards, P.A., and Scott Edwards (Boca Raton); The Law Offices of Brett A. Weinberg, and Brett A. Weinberg, for appellant.
Young, Bill, Boles, Palmer & Duke, P.A., and B. Richard Young, Adam A. Duke, Michel A. Morgan and Derek L. Veliz, for appellee.
Before FERNANDEZ, LOGUE and SCALES, JJ.
PER CURIAM. We affirm the trial court’s grant of summary judgment. Because Appellee
GEICO concedes Appellant Brett Weinberg’s entitlement to (but not the amount
of) fees based on GEICO’s confession of judgment, and because the trial court’s
summary judgment retained jurisdiction to address the parties’ claims for fees, we
do not reach the fee issue raised by Appellant.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Weinberg v. Geico General Ins. Co., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weinberg-v-geico-general-ins-co-fladistctapp-2017.