Weinberg v. Dickson-Weinberg
This text of Weinberg v. Dickson-Weinberg (Weinberg v. Dickson-Weinberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-15-0000362 19-JUL-2016 08:13 AM
SCWC-15-0000362
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
JAN MICHAEL WEINBERG, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,
vs.
BRENDA IRENE DICKSON-WEINBERG, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-15-0000362; FC-D NO. 04-1-3936)
ORDER DISMISSING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ., and Circuit Judge Chang, in place of McKenna, J., recused)
It appearing that the judgment on appeal in the above-
referenced matter not having been filed by the Intermediate Court
of Appeals at the time the application for writ of certiorari was
filed, see Hawai#i Revised Statutes § 602-59(a) (Supp. 2013); see
also Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule 36(b)(1)
(2012),
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner/Defendant-
Appellant’s application for writ of certiorari, filed
June 29, 2016, is dismissed without prejudice to re-filing the application pursuant to HRAP Rule 40.1(a) (2014). (“The
application shall be filed within thirty days after the filing of
the intermediate court of appeals’ judgment on appeal or
dismissal order, unless the time for filing the application is
extended in accordance with this rule.”).
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, July 19, 2016.
Brenda Dickson /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald petitioner pro se /s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Richard W. Pollack
/s/ Michael D. Wilson
/s/ Gary W.B. Chang
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Weinberg v. Dickson-Weinberg, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weinberg-v-dickson-weinberg-haw-2016.