Weinberg v. Dean

Appellate Court of Illinois

Weinberg v. Dean

152 Ill. App. 122, 1909 Ill. App. LEXIS 182

DecidedDecember 15, 1909

StatusPublished

This text of 152 Ill. App. 122 (Weinberg v. Dean) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Weinberg v. Dean, 152 Ill. App. 122, 1909 Ill. App. LEXIS 182 (Ill. Ct. App. 1909).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an action in trespass for the recovery of damages for the refusal of the defendant to deliver certain corn to the plaintiff under an alleged contract. A trial was had by jury which resulted in a verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiff for nominal damages. To reverse such judgment this appeal is prosecuted by the plaintiff.

The record does not contain a bill of exceptions properly signed by the trial judge. It is not contended that any intrinsic error appears on the face of the record. The errors relied upon for reversal are the rulings of the trial court as to the admissibility of certain evidence, and the- giving and refusal of certain instructions. Inasmuch as the exceptions to such rulings are not preserved by a bill of exceptions, there is nothing presented for the consideration of this court. Vanlandingham v. Fellows, 1 Scam. 233; People v. Weston, 236 Ill. 104. The recitals of the clerk that exceptions were taken are of no effect.

The judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This is an action in trespass for the recovery of damages for the refusal of the defendant to deliver certain corn to the plaintiff under an alleged contract. A trial was had by jury which resulted in a verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiff for nominal damages. To reverse such judgment this appeal is prosecuted by the plaintiff.

The record does not contain a bill of exceptions properly signed by the trial judge. It is not contended that any intrinsic error appears on the face of the record. The errors relied upon for reversal are the rulings of the trial court as to the admissibility of certain evidence, and the- giving and refusal of certain instructions. Inasmuch as the exceptions to such rulings are not preserved by a bill of exceptions, there is nothing presented for the consideration of this court. Vanlandingham v. Fellows, 1 Scam. 233; People v. Weston, 236 Ill. 104. The recitals of the clerk that exceptions were taken are of no effect.

The judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

152 Ill. App. 122, 1909 Ill. App. LEXIS 182, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weinberg-v-dean-illappct-1909.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack