Weinberg v. Bort

961 So. 2d 1017, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 10714, 2007 WL 1988943
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 11, 2007·No. No. 4D07-363·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Lynn Weinberg appeals an order entered in the probate of her father’s estate disbursing $50,000 to her sister, Deborah Bort, pursuant to a settlement agreement. She also argues error in some of the other disbursements; however, she has failed to provide this court with a sufficient record in order for this court to determine that the trial court erred. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla.1979) (without record adequate to demonstrate reversible error, appellate court cannot conclude that trial judge so misconceived the evidence or law as to require reversal); Fla. R.App. P. 9.200.

Further complicating our review is the fact that Weinberg’s brief contains no reference to the record. Finally, her complaints about errors in litigation in New Jersey are not within the jurisdiction of this court. For any and all of the above reasons, we affirm.

WARNER, KLEIN and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Weinberg v. Bort, 961 So. 2d 1017, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 10714, 2007 WL 1988943 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

961 So. 2d 1017 (Weinberg v. Bort) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee
377 So. 2d 1150 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1979)