Weinbaum v. Cuomo
664 N.E.2d 506, 87 N.Y.2d 917, 641 N.Y.S.2d 595, 1996 N.Y. LEXIS 75
This text of 664 N.E.2d 506 (Weinbaum v. Cuomo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Weinbaum v. Cuomo, 664 N.E.2d 506, 87 N.Y.2d 917, 641 N.Y.S.2d 595, 1996 N.Y. LEXIS 75 (N.Y. 1996).
Opinion
Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Simons, Titone, Bellacosa, Levine and Ciparick. Judge Smith dissents and votes to retain jurisdiction on the ground that the allegations of racial discrimination in the funding of City University of New York and State University of New York present substantial constitutional questions and support an appeal as of right pursuant to CPLR 5601 (b) (1).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
664 N.E.2d 506, 87 N.Y.2d 917, 641 N.Y.S.2d 595, 1996 N.Y. LEXIS 75, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weinbaum-v-cuomo-ny-1996.