Wein v. Nachinson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Wein v. Nachinson

50 A.D.2d 602, 375 N.Y.S.2d 849, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12384

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 17, 1975·Published

Opinion

— In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered November 15, 1974, in favor of defendants, upon a directed verdict. Judgment reversed, on the law, and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. No fact questions have been considered. The evidence raised an issue of fact for the jury as to defendants’ negligence and plaintiff Morris Wein’s freedom from contributory negligence. Accordingly, the jury [603]*603should have been permitted to pass upon these fact questions (cf. Arnold v Schmeiser, 34 AD2d 568). Gulotta, P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Latham and Margett, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered November 15, 1974, in favor of defendants, upon a directed verdict. Judgment reversed, on the law, and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. No fact questions have been considered. The evidence raised an issue of fact for the jury as to defendants’ negligence and plaintiff Morris Wein’s freedom from contributory negligence. Accordingly, the jury [603]*603should have been permitted to pass upon these fact questions (cf. Arnold v Schmeiser, 34 AD2d 568). Gulotta, P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Latham and Margett, JJ., concur.

Wein v. Nachinson, 50 A.D.2d 602, 375 N.Y.S.2d 849, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12384 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

50 A.D.2d 602 (Wein v. Nachinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related