Wein v. Nachinson
This text of 50 A.D.2d 602 (Wein v. Nachinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered November 15, 1974, in favor of defendants, upon a directed verdict. Judgment reversed, on the law, and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. No fact questions have been considered. The evidence raised an issue of fact for the jury as to defendants’ negligence and plaintiff Morris Wein’s freedom from contributory negligence. Accordingly, the jury [603]*603should have been permitted to pass upon these fact questions (cf. Arnold v Schmeiser, 34 AD2d 568). Gulotta, P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Latham and Margett, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
50 A.D.2d 602, 375 N.Y.S.2d 849, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12384, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wein-v-nachinson-nyappdiv-1975.