Weimorts v. Shockley

47 So. 3d 386, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 17652, 2010 WL 4628999
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 17, 2010
Docket1D10-2660
StatusPublished

This text of 47 So. 3d 386 (Weimorts v. Shockley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Weimorts v. Shockley, 47 So. 3d 386, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 17652, 2010 WL 4628999 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Michael Weimorts appeals an order extending a temporary injunction for protection against dating violence, entered the same day the court denied Weimorts’ motion to dismiss for improper venue. Because section 784.046, Florida Statutes (2009), providing for a protective injunction against dating violence, does not contain a special venue provision, the trial court was required to apply the general venue provision in section 47.011, Florida Statutes (2009). Barr v. Fla. Bd. of Regents, 644 So.2d 333, 335 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). Under section 47.011, “[a]ctions shall be brought only in the county where the defendant resides, where the cause of action accrued, or where the property in litigation is located....” See Hill v. Fields, 813 So.2d 212, 213 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) *387 (holding that wife petitioning for domestic violence injunction was required to file in county of former husband’s residence and venue in county of wife’s residence was improper). 1 Weimorts resides in Walton County, any cause of action accrued in Walton County, and the third option allowing venue where the property in litigation is located is not applicable. Thus, venue lies only in Walton County. As a result, the trial court reversibly erred in refusing to transfer venue from Okaloosa County, the residence of the complainant Wendy Shockley, 2 to Walton County. Hill, 813 So.2d at 213.

REVERSED.

KAHN, VAN NORTWICK, and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.
1

. Subsequent to the decision in Hill, the legislature amended section 741.30, Florida Statutes, to add a special venue provision, section 741.30(l)(j), allowing a petition to be filed in the circuit where the petitioner resides. Ch. 2002-55, § 13, at 793, Laws of Fla. There is no indication by the legislature that this special venue provision applies outside chapter 741.

2

. We recognize, as did the trial court, that under the instructions to family law form 12.980(n) appended to the Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure, a petitioner filing a petition for prohibition against dating violence is instructed to file the petition in the circuit where she lives. However, these instructions cannot contradict section 47.011. Barr, 644 So.2d at 335 ("[t]he general venue statute controls actions brought under the common law or under statutes not containing a specific provision respecting venue.”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Barr v. Florida Bd. of Regents
644 So. 2d 333 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Hill v. Fields
813 So. 2d 212 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
47 So. 3d 386, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 17652, 2010 WL 4628999, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weimorts-v-shockley-fladistctapp-2010.