Weimer v. State

32 S.W.2d 652, 116 Tex. Crim. 282, 1930 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 740
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 12, 1930
DocketNo. 13631.
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 32 S.W.2d 652 (Weimer v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Weimer v. State, 32 S.W.2d 652, 116 Tex. Crim. 282, 1930 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 740 (Tex. 1930).

Opinion

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction for possessing intoxicating liquor for purposes of sale; punishment, one year in the penitentiary.

The statement of facts and bills of exception can not be considered because filed too late. The sentence and notice of appeal of appellant were of date December 20, 1929, and the defendant was then given eighty days in which to file statement of facts and bills of exception. Simple computation would make evident the fact that this eighty day period expired on March 10, 1930. It further appears in the record that on March 20, 1930, the learned trial judge made and filed an order of extension allowing to defendant ten days additional within which to file statement of facts and bills of exception. Under all the authorities the court was without power to make such order at the time he made it. It was made ten days after the expiration of the original order and after the adjournment of his court. Jones v. State, 94 Tex. Crim. Rep. 471. The bills of exception herein were filed March 24th, and same are thus seen to be filed too late. The statement of facts was filed the same day, and, therefore, cannot be considered.

No error appearing, the judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Hawkins, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rehm v. State
78 S.W.2d 983 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1935)
Barfield v. State
75 S.W.2d 106 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1934)
Davis v. State
45 S.W.2d 1101 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
32 S.W.2d 652, 116 Tex. Crim. 282, 1930 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 740, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weimer-v-state-texcrimapp-1930.