Weill v. Weill
This text of 10 N.Y.S. 627 (Weill v. Weill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The husband and wife both swear that the alimony has been paid, and, besides, I am not referred to any case in which it has been held that an attorney has a lien upon the alimony awarded to the wife by a final judgment rendered in her favor, in an action for a separation. The costs cannot be collected by a proceeding to punish for contempt. Jacquin v. Jacquin, 36 [628]*628Hun, 378. Apparently, all that the court can do is to permit the attorney to issue an execution to collect the costs, and an order giving such permission, with $10 costs of this motion, may be entered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
10 N.Y.S. 627, 18 N.Y. Civ. Proc. R. 241, 1890 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 891, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weill-v-weill-nysupct-1890.