Weill v. Weill

10 N.Y.S. 627, 18 N.Y. Civ. Proc. R. 241, 1890 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 891
New York Supreme Court·Decided April 12, 1890·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Andrews, J.

The husband and wife both swear that the alimony has been paid, and, besides, I am not referred to any case in which it has been held that an attorney has a lien upon the alimony awarded to the wife by a final judgment rendered in her favor, in an action for a separation. The costs cannot be collected by a proceeding to punish for contempt. Jacquin v. Jacquin, 36 [628] Hun, 378. Apparently, all that the court can do is to permit the attorney to issue an execution to collect the costs, and an order giving such permission, with $10 costs of this motion, may be entered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Weill v. Weill, 10 N.Y.S. 627, 18 N.Y. Civ. Proc. R. 241, 1890 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 891 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1890).

10 N.Y.S. 627 (Weill v. Weill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Letts v. Letts
96 A. 887 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1916)
Hilleary v. Hilleary
175 S.W. 282 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1915)