Weill v. Malone

New York Supreme Court

Weill v. Malone

36 N.Y.S. 114

DecidedDecember 2, 1895

StatusPublished

This text of 36 N.Y.S. 114 (Weill v. Malone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Weill v. Malone, 36 N.Y.S. 114 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1895).

Pincite

Opinion

DYKMAN, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered upon the decision of a justice of this court after a trial at the special term, and also from an order denying a motion of the plaintiffs’ to open the judgment. The facts are recited in the opinion of the trial judge, and, as we concur in his conclusions, a recitation of the case by us would be unprofitable.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs, on the opinion of the trial judge, and, as the appeal from the order is destitute of merit, it should be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DYKMAN, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered upon the decision of a justice of this court after a trial at the special term, and also from an order denying a motion of the plaintiffs’ to open the judgment. The facts are recited in the opinion of the trial judge, and, as we concur in his conclusions, a recitation of the case by us would be unprofitable.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs, on the opinion of the trial judge, and, as the appeal from the order is destitute of merit, it should be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

36 N.Y.S. 114, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weill-v-malone-nysupct-1895.